Tender analysis that gives your estimating team the clarity, speed, and commercial edge to price with confidence, even under impossible deadlines.
We review every document in your tender package cover to cover, every spec, every drawing reference, every addendum, and deliver a structured intelligence report that surfaces scope gaps, pricing risks, and commercial red flags before your team starts pricing.
Your first review is on us so you can judge the quality firsthand.
Choose the depth that matches the complexity and value of the tender you're pricing.
A single missed scope gap on a $2M tender typically costs $30,000 to $80,000+ to rectify post-contract.
Deep analysis of the tender documents to surface what's missing, what's risky, and what needs clarification before you commit a single hour to pricing.
Everything in Package 1, plus structured analysis of your subcontractor quotes to catch exclusion conflicts, pricing anomalies, and BOQ chaos.
Includes all deliverables from Package 1
The full picture. Document intelligence, pricing analysis, and commercial strategy to help you decide how, and whether, to price the job.
Includes all deliverables from Packages 1 & 2
Got a tender on your desk right now?
Send Us Your DocumentsYour first Package 1 review is on us so you can judge the quality firsthand.
We're building something new for the construction industry and we want to prove the value before asking you to commit.
No charge, no obligation. Send us a live tender and we'll deliver the full intelligence report within 24 hours.
If the first report earns your trust, your next upgrade is half price. That's a full pricing intelligence or strategy report at $495 or $745 + GST.
An actual page from a Tender Intelligence Review we delivered for a commercial restaurant build in Western Australia. 198 documents, 8 disciplines, 12 scope gaps, 13 risks, 20 RFIs.
Want to see what we'd find in your next tender?
Send Us Your Next TenderFirst review on us. 24 hour turnaround.
Expanded deliverables that build on the Package 1 intelligence report.
Every subcontractor quote broken down into a structured comparison. Exclusions cross-referenced against the tender scope to flag conflicts.
| Trade | Subcontractor | Price | Key Exclusions | Risk Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical | Apex Electrical | $387,000 | Emergency lighting, solar PV | HIGH: Emergency lighting req per spec 265000 |
| Electrical | ProVolt Systems | $412,500 | Solar PV only | MED: Solar PV cost undefined |
| Mechanical | CoolAir Mech | $198,000 | Acoustic enclosures, BMS | HIGH: 35% below competitors, likely scope omission |
| Mechanical | Westside HVAC | $310,000 | Nil exclusions | LOW |
| Hydraulics | FlowTech Plumbing | $142,000 | Grease trap, trade waste | HIGH: Grease trap is spec requirement |
Illustrative example. Names and figures anonymised.
Each subcontractor exclusion checked against the tender spec to identify conflicts that leave scope unpriced or create post-contract disputes.
| Subcontractor | Exclusion | Spec Reference | Conflict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apex Electrical | Emergency lighting | Spec 265000 S3.2 | YES: Spec requires supply and install to AS2293 |
| CoolAir Mech | Acoustic enclosures | Acoustic Rpt S4.1 | YES: Required to meet WA noise regulations |
| FlowTech Plumbing | Trade waste connection | H010 Note 3 | PARTIAL: Contractor scope, approval timeline unclear |
Illustrative example. Names and figures anonymised.
Structured project risk assessment to guide pricing strategy and contingency allocation.
| Category | Risk Level | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Contract Terms | HIGH | Liquidated damages at $8,500/day, no extension of time for latent conditions |
| Programme | HIGH | 16 week programme with 4 week steel lead time, leaves 2 weeks float total |
| Scope Clarity | MEDIUM | Architectural drawings for tender only, specification not issued, 12 scope gaps identified |
| Design Completeness | HIGH | No IFC drawings released, structural steel drawings absent, solar PV not detailed |
| Authority Approvals | MEDIUM | BAL report expired, trade waste agreement not lodged, construction noise plan not issued |
| Client Interface | MEDIUM | Owner furnished equipment schedule not provided, scope split unclear |
Illustrative example. Names and figures anonymised.
"The report identified 12 scope gaps and 7 high severity commercial risks across 198 tender documents that would have taken our estimating team days to find manually. The suggested RFIs alone saved us significant time and reduced our pricing exposure on a project with incomplete design documentation."Construction Tech Systems client, commercial restaurant build, Western Australia
Three things that make working with us simple.
Send us your tender documents and we get to work. No briefing meetings, no scope workshops, no back and forth. We review every document in your tender package cover to cover. Your team stays focused on pricing while we handle the document intelligence.
A structured debrief framework your team can use after every tender, whether you win or lose. Maps what was caught, what was missed, and where commercial risk was underestimated. Over time, this builds institutional knowledge that makes your internal reviews sharper.
Before we deliver your report, we configure our analysis against your specific trade scope, whether you're a head contractor pricing the full job or a subcontractor focused on mechanical, electrical, hydraulics, or fitout. The deliverables are mapped to the trades you actually price, not generic construction boilerplate.
All tender documents you share with us are treated as strictly confidential. Your documents are reviewed solely for the purpose of preparing your intelligence report and are not shared with, disclosed to, or accessible by any third party. Once the report is delivered, your tender documents are retained for 14 days in case you need revisions, then permanently deleted from our systems. We are happy to execute a mutual NDA prior to receiving any documents if required.
Send us your next tender, or get in touch to discuss how we can help.
Your first Package 1 review is on us so you can judge the quality firsthand.